Matter of Interpretation

By:

Antonin Scalia

Contributor(s):

SCALIA (Antonin)

Material type: Text

TextLanguage: English Publication details: New Jersey Princeton University Press 2022Description: xxiv,173p. PB 21x14cmISBN:

9780691243269

Subject(s):

DDC classification:

23 340.1 SCAM

Summary: Like Socrates long ago, Antonin Scalia loved to argue. As with the best Socratic dialogues of old, the book you now hold in your hand overflows with opinion—not just assertions of its provocative protagonist, but also contentions arrayed against the provocateur’s position. To his great credit, Justice Scalia invited pushback to the views he laid out in the main text of this book. Several towering scholars of his era—Gordon S. Wood, Laurence H. Tribe, Mary Ann Glendon, and Ronald Dworkin—rose to the challenge with sparkling responses that did not merely say, “Amen.” Repeatedly, these response essays also...

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Collection	Call number	Status	Barcode
Book	St Aloysius Law Library	Law	340.1 SCAM (Browse shelf(Opens below))	Available	LL000085
Book	St Aloysius Law Library	Law	340.1 SCAM (Browse shelf(Opens below))	Available	LL000086
Book	St Aloysius Law Library	Law	340.1 SCAM (Browse shelf(Opens below))	Available	LL000087
Book	St Aloysius Law Library	Law	340.1 SCAM (Browse shelf(Opens below))	Available	LL000088
Book	St Aloysius Law Library	Law	340.1 SCAM (Browse shelf(Opens below))	Available	LL000089

Total holds: 0

Browsing St Aloysius Law Library shelves, Collection: Law Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous								Next
Previous	340.1 SCAM Matter of Interpretation	340.1 SCAM Matter of Interpretation	340.1 SCAM Matter of Interpretation	340.1 SCAM Matter of Interpretation	340.1092 GUER Ronald Dworkin: Jurists Profiles in Legal Theory	340.1092 GUER Ronald Dworkin: Jurists Profiles in Legal Theory	340.1092 GUER Ronald Dworkin: Jurists Profiles in Legal Theory	Next

Like Socrates long ago, Antonin Scalia loved to argue. As with the best Socratic dialogues of old, the book you now hold in your hand overflows with opinion—not just assertions of its provocative protagonist, but also contentions arrayed against the provocateur’s position. To his great credit, Justice Scalia invited pushback to the views he laid out in the main text of this book. Several towering scholars of his era—Gordon S. Wood, Laurence H. Tribe, Mary Ann Glendon, and Ronald Dworkin—rose to the challenge with sparkling responses that did not merely say, “Amen.” Repeatedly, these response essays also...

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer